Harrison
Harrison v. City and County of San Francisco
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PATRINA HARRISON, Case No. 21-cv-07072-JD
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS
v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO,
11 Defendant.
12 Pro se plaintiff Patrina Harrison has sued defendant City and County of San Francisco over an incident at a supermarket in December 2019. Dkt. No. 1. Harrison says that she was attacked by a store manager, and that the SFPD declined to help her make a citizen’s arrest because “the City and County of San Francisco does not allow for Negro races to have white citizens arrested, and that is per City and County of San Francisco’s Municipal Policy.” Id. ¶ 9. Harrison alleged civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, and 2000d. San Francisco has moved to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Dkt. No. 12. Dismissal is granted. As a pro se plaintiff, Harrison gets a liberal construction of her complaint and the benefit of any doubts, but she still must satisfy the requirements of Rule 8 and state facts…