Austin v. ABC Legal

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 7, 20223:21-cv-09076California629 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN, Case No. 21-cv-09076-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. EXTENSION OF TIME

ABC LEGAL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 90, 91 Defendant.

12 The Court entered final judgment in the above-captioned case on May 31, 2022. Dkt. No. 89. Before the Court is plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal beyond the 30-day period prescribed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(1)(A). Dkt. Nos. 90, 91 (plaintiff’s motions). Plaintiff’s motion states, in full:

17 Plaintiff, Mr. George Jarvis Austin, notes the lower court’s errors in judgment, and moves for additional time to Appeal due to temporary constraints on this portion of my budget. Mr. Austin also realized a potential need for a bit more time around the holidays and moves for a slightly later date in December [2022] instead of November. Dkt. No. 91 (the motion at Dkt. No. 90 contains only the first sentence from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.