Harris

Harris v. Ramirez

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20223:22-cv-01568California1,900 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TEVIN LEE HARRIS,

Case No. 22-cv-01568 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO FILE v. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; DENYING MOTION FOR RECUSAL B. RAMIREZ, Defendant. (Docket No. 14)

17 Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against a correctional officer at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”), where he is currently housed. Dkt. No. 1. On April 21, 2022, the Court denied Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”), and later ordered briefing on his motion for a preliminary injunction. Dkt. Nos. 10, 13. Plaintiff has filed a motion for reconsideration and motion to recuse the Undersigned. Dkt. No. 14. For the reasons discussed below, the motions are DENIED. /// /// 27 DISCUSSION A. Motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.