Unique

Unique v. Claybaugh

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 7, 20221:22-cv-00711California2,684 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 TARRYN UNIQUE, et al., Case No. 22-cv-00711-VKD

Plaintiffs,

ORDER OF SERVICE; REFERRING

v. MATTER TO FEDERAL PRO SE

PROGRAM TO LOCATE COUNSEL;

JOSEPH CLAYBAUGH, et al., INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK Defendants.

13 Pro se plaintiffs Tarryn Unique and Miguel White filed the instant civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendants Joseph Claybaugh and the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Dkt. Nos. 1, 11. Plaintiffs’ motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt Nos. 9, 12) are addressed in a separate order. Dkt. No. 14. I. STANDARD OF REVIEW A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.