Daramola

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TAYO E DARAMOLA, Case No. 19-cv-07910-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE DISMISSAL

v.

ORACLE AMERICA, INC., et al., Defendants.

12 In prior orders, the Court dismissed four individual defendants for lack of personal jurisdiction, after plaintiff Daramola had an opportunity for jurisdictional discovery. Dkt. Nos. 66, 74. The dismissal was based on a record indicating that Daramola lived and worked in Canada, the individual defendants all resided and worked outside California, and the key events alleged in the complaint occurred outside California. Dkt. No. 74 at 1. The Court specifically concluded that the use of defendant Oracle America’s servers and online resources in California was not enough to demonstrate systematic contacts within the state for personal jurisdiction purposes. Id. at 2. Defendants Oracle America and two remaining individuals within California, Douglas Harris and Patrick Merrell, ask to apply a similar extraterritoriality analysis to dismiss…