Bielski

Bielski v. Coinbase Global, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 7, 20223:21-cv-07478California861 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ABRAHAM BIELSKI, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, No. C 21-07478 WHA Plaintiffs,

v.

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

COINBASE, INC., STAY PENDING APPEAL AND

VACATING HEARING

Defendant.

15 In this putative class action, defendant moves to stay proceedings pending appeal of an order denying a motion to compel arbitration. For the reasons herein, defendant’s motion is DENIED. A previous order described our facts (Dkt. No. 42). Defendant Coinbase, Inc. operates a cryptocurrency exchange platform where, in brief, users can buy and trade various forms of cryptocurrency and hold their assets in digital wallets. After the equivalent of $31,039.06 was transferred out of plaintiff Abraham Bielski’s Coinbase account, he turned to Coinbase for assistance but ran into egregious barriers to adequate customer service (Bielski Decl. ¶¶ 6–8). Bielski filed this lawsuit against Coinbase in September…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.