Kakkar

Kakkar v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 7, 20225:19-cv-05369California6,565 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 5:13-cr-00736-EJD-

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR CORRECT

v. SENTENCE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2255 SANJIV KAKKAR, Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 201

Before the Court is Defendant Sanjiv Kakkar’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence for wire fraud and making false statements to a bank. See Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (“Mot.”), Dkt. No. 201. On August 14, 2020, the Government filed its response to Defendant’s motion. See United States’ Response in Opposition to Petitioner’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct (“Response”), Dkt. No. 230. Thereafter, on December 17, 2020, Defendant filed his reply. See Petitioner’s Reply in Support of Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct (“Reply”), Dkt. No. 238. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.