Franklin

Franklin v. McDonough

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 7, 20225:21-cv-06328California608 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 DAVID M. FRANKLIN, Case No. 21-cv-06328-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

v. CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE

TO PROSECUTE

DENIS MCDONOUGH,

Defendant.

13 The Court held a conference via Zoom webinar on June 7, 2022 to discuss the status of this matter. Dkt. No. 38. Defendant appeared. Plaintiff David Franklin did not. The Court invited the parties in advance of the conference to tell the Court whether they preferred an in-person appearance. Dkt. No. 35. The Court received no response from Mr. Franklin. Nor did he respond to the Court’s attempts to reach him by email during the conference. The Court was also unable to reach Mr. Franklin by telephone, as the phone number he provided to the Court resulted in an automated message stating that the call could not be completed as dialed. At the conference, defense counsel advised that he was able to send an email to Mr. Franklin as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.