Novoselac
Novoselac v. ISM Vuzem d.o.o.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 STJEPAN NOVOSELAC, et al., Case No. 21-cv-08654-BLF
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
v. DISMISS COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE
TO AMEND
ISM VUZEM D.O.O., et al., [Re: ECF 12] Defendants.
12
14 Defendants Tesla, Inc. and Eisenmann Corporation (“Moving Parties”) seek dismissal of the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Plaintiffs’ counsel did not appear when the case was called for hearing at 9:30 a.m. on May 19, 2022. After waiting until 9:45 a.m., the Court stated its ruling on the record. The Court did not hear substantive argument. The motion is GRANTED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. I. DISCUSSION Plaintiffs sue for wages and penalties allegedly owed to them for construction work they performed at Tesla’s facility in Fremont, California between November 2014 and June 2016. Compl. ¶ 17. As relevant here, they assert violations of California Labor Code provisions…