Poorsina
Poorsina v. Tseng
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION
7 ALI R. POORSINA, Case No: 20-cv-09122 SBA 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT vs. 10 TAN TSENG, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Plaintiff Ali R. Poorsina (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, brings the instant action against Defendants Tan Tseng (“Tseng”), Terrenz Kukant Cam (“T.K. Cam”), Boi Anh Hong (“Hong”), and Kevin Tu Cam (“K.T. Cam”) (collectively, “Defendants”). Pending is Defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The matter is suitable for resolution without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted. I. BACKGROUND A. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS Plaintiff previously “owned and occupied the single-family residence located [at] 1563 2[8]th Avenue, San Francisco, California 94122 (the ‘Property’).” Compl. ¶ 4, Dkt. 1. It appears Plaintiff defaulted on his mortgage and the mortgage holder instituted 24 …