Poorsina

Poorsina v. Tseng

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 7, 20223:20-cv-09122California3,124 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

7 ALI R. POORSINA, Case No: 20-cv-09122 SBA 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT vs. 10 TAN TSENG, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Plaintiff Ali R. Poorsina (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, brings the instant action against Defendants Tan Tseng (“Tseng”), Terrenz Kukant Cam (“T.K. Cam”), Boi Anh Hong (“Hong”), and Kevin Tu Cam (“K.T. Cam”) (collectively, “Defendants”). Pending is Defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The matter is suitable for resolution without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted. I. BACKGROUND A. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS Plaintiff previously “owned and occupied the single-family residence located [at] 1563 2[8]th Avenue, San Francisco, California 94122 (the ‘Property’).” Compl. ¶ 4, Dkt. 1. It appears Plaintiff defaulted on his mortgage and the mortgage holder instituted 24 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.