Aguilar

Aguilar v. Eaton

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 9, 20223:21-cv-08798California977 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

REYES D. AGUILAR,

Case No. 21-cv-08798-JCS (PR) Petitioner, 9 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

PATRICK EATON,

11 Respondent. Dkt. Nos. 2 and 6

13 INTRODUCTION Petitioner seeks federal habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 from his state convictions. The amended petition for such relief is here for review under 28 U.S.C. § 2243 and Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. The amended petition (Dkt. No. 10), which is the operative petition in this action, states cognizable claims. On or before October 17, 2022, respondent shall file in response to the petition an answer or a dispositive motion. Petitioner has consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction for all purposes under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). (Dkt. No. 3.) Petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) is GRANTED. The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions. BACKGROUND According to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.