Woodruff
Woodruff v. De Facto Barrett Daffin Frappier Treder & Weiss, LLP
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION 5 Case No: 21-cv-06862-SBA KEVIN WOODRUFF, et al.,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION
Plaintiffs, TO DISMISS WITHOUT LEAVE
TO AMEND
v.
DE FACTO BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER TREDER & WEISS, LLP, et al., 10 Defendants. 11 Plaintiffs Kevin Woodruff (“Woodruff”), Tanya Stutson (“Stutson”), and Wanag Tahatan-Bey (“Tahatan-Bey”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), proceeding pro se, bring the instant action concerning the “pillaging” of their estate. Defendant Barrett Daffin Frappier Treder & Weiss, LLP (“BDFTW”), erroneously sued as “De Facto Barrett Daffin Frappier Treder & Weiss, LLP,” moves to dismiss or, in the alternative, for a more definite statement. The matter is suitable for resolution without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted.1 I. BACKGROUND A. INSTANT ACTION On September 3, 2021, Plaintiffs initiated the instant action by filing a document titled Trial by…