In re Pinterest Derivative Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 9, 20223:20-cv-08331California2,262 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

No. C 20-08331-WHA 7 No. C 20-08438-WHA No. C 20-09390-WHA No. C 21-05385-WHA 9 (Consolidated)

ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR FINAL

This Document Relates to: SETTLEMENT APPROVAL AND

ATTORNEY’S FEES

ALL ACTIONS.

14 INTRODUCTION In this shareholder derivative suit, plaintiffs move for final approval of a settlement and for attorney’s fees and costs. Defendants do not oppose, but one shareholder has objected. For the reasons stated below, the objection is OVERRULED. To the extent stated below, the motions are GRANTED. STATEMENT A prior order detailed our facts (Dkt. No. 115). In brief, this lawsuit, brought by Pinterest shareholders, arises out of allegations of widespread race and sex discrimination at defendant Pinterest, Inc. Two former Pinterest employees, for example, complained internally, and later publicly, about discrimination they experienced as Black women while working for Pinterest. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.