Wescott

Wescott v. Block

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 13, 20223:22-cv-00543California3,242 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CARL A. WESCOTT, Case No. 22-cv-00543-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

v. RECOMMENDATION DISMISSING

COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO

ROBERT J. BLOCK, et al., AMEND Defendants. Docket Nos. 6,

12 13 Plaintiff Carl Wescott, proceeding pro se, has filed suit against (1) his ex-wife Monette Stephens; (2) her attorney, the attorney’s law firm, and the other partner in the firm (Terry Szucsko, Milla Lvovich, and Lvovich & Szucsko); and (3) Robert Block, a paralegal for the attorney who represented Mr. Wescott. Previously, Judge Ryu granted Mr. Wescott’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. However, in a report and recommendation (“R&R”), she recommended that his complaint be dismissed with leave to amend pursuant to the required review of his pleading under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Mr. Wescott did not object to Judge Ryu’s R&R. The Court has reviewed the R&R and finds it thorough, well reasoned,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.