Wescott
Wescott v. Block
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CARL A. WESCOTT, Case No. 22-cv-00543-EMC
Plaintiff,
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
v. RECOMMENDATION DISMISSING
COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO
ROBERT J. BLOCK, et al., AMEND Defendants. Docket Nos. 6,
12 13 Plaintiff Carl Wescott, proceeding pro se, has filed suit against (1) his ex-wife Monette Stephens; (2) her attorney, the attorney’s law firm, and the other partner in the firm (Terry Szucsko, Milla Lvovich, and Lvovich & Szucsko); and (3) Robert Block, a paralegal for the attorney who represented Mr. Wescott. Previously, Judge Ryu granted Mr. Wescott’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. However, in a report and recommendation (“R&R”), she recommended that his complaint be dismissed with leave to amend pursuant to the required review of his pleading under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Mr. Wescott did not object to Judge Ryu’s R&R. The Court has reviewed the R&R and finds it thorough, well reasoned,…