Villagrana

Villagrana v. Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 13, 20224:22-cv-02618California2,200 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 AMBROSIO VILLAGRANA, Case No. 22-cv-02618-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF PARTIAL SERVICE;

v. DISMISSING CERTAIN DEFENDANTS

WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

SCOTT KERNAN, et al.,

Defendants.

12 Plaintiff, an inmate at Correctional Training Facility in Soledad, California (“CTF- Soledad”), has filed a pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. His complaint is now before the Court for review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate order. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or seek monetary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.