Miletak

Miletak v. Acuity Mutual Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 13, 20225:22-cv-00633California4,104 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 NICK MILETAK, Case No. 22-cv-00633-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING PENDING

v. MOTIONS

ACUITY MUTUAL INSURANCE [Re: ECF No. 16, 17, 20, 41]

COMPANY,

11 Defendant. 12 In this case, pro se Plaintiff Nick Miletak sues Defendant Acuity Mutual Insurance Company for defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and intentional interference with economic advantage. Miletak alleges that Darcel Lang, an employee of Acuity, falsely reported Miletak to Miletak’s employer about improper conduct related to an insurance claim made by Miletak’s goddaughter. Miletak alleges that the report caused him humiliation and led him to resign from his employment. Miletak filed this lawsuit in Santa Clara County Superior Court on November 10, 2021. Acuity answered the complaint and Lang filed a cross-claim against Miletak for defamation. Defendants removed the case to this Court in January 2022.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.