Storms

Storms v. County of Monterey

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 8, 20225:20-cv-07913California9,120 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD STORMS, Case No. 20-cv-07913-NC Plaintiff,

AMENDED ORDER GRANTING IN

v. PART AND DENYING IN PART

CROSS MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL

COUNTY OF MONTEREY, SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendant. Re: ECF 47, 48, 82 15 Before the Court are cross motions for partial summary judgment in this disability discrimination in employment case. Plaintiff Richard Storms is suing Defendant the County of Monterey for California Fair Employment and Housing Act violations, Family and Medical Leave Act and whistleblower retaliation, and Constitutional violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Storms moves for partial summary judgment on five issues, the County moves for partial summary judgment on seven issues, and between the two motions, eight of the nine claims in this case are implicated. Having considered the parties’ briefs, oral arguments, and the applicable law, the Court grants in part and denies in part the cross motions. I. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.