Webb

Webb v. Dunkin

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 14, 20224:22-cv-02040California1,350 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANTHONY L. WEBB, Case No. 22-cv-02040-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.

E. SHEDXI DUNKIN, et al., Defendants.

12 Plaintiff, an inmate at Maguire Correctional Facility, has filed a pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. His complaint (ECF No. 1) is now before the Court for review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. His request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis has been granted in a separate order. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). Pro se pleadings…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.