Umberger

Umberger v. City of Santa Rosa

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 14, 20223:22-cv-03280California597 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DONALD E. UMBERGER, Case No. 22-cv-03280-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IFP, DISMISSING

v. COMPLAINT WITOUT PREJUDICE,

AND MOOTING TRO WITHOUT

CITY OF SANTA ROSA, et al., PREJUDICE TO IT BEING REFILED

AT A LATER DATE

Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 2, 4

13 On June 3, 2022, plaintiff filed the instant action asking this Court to “stop [his] extrajudicial 14 eviction [and] stop the harassment” plaintiff is allegedly experiencing at the hands of defendants. 15 Dkt. No. 1 at 71 (Complaint). Plaintiff alleges defendant City of Santa Rosa is “extrajudicially 16 evicting [him] from the property” where he has had tenancy in his “trailer conspicuous[ly] for 10 17 months.” Dkt. No. 4 at 3 (TRO). 18 Plaintiff also filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Dkt. No. 2. Plaintiff is 19 self employed as a handy man earning approximately $1200 per month with monthly expenses of 20 approximately $500 per month not including gas. Thus, plaintiff’s monthly income barely…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.