McCulloch

McCulloch v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 15, 20223:19-cv-07716California4,598 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 KRISTIN E. MCCULLOCH, Case No. 19-cv-07716-SI

Plaintiff,

OPINION AND MEMORANDUM OF

v. DECISION ON PLAINTIFF’S ERISA

SECTION 1132(A)(1)(B) ACTION TO

HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT CLARIFY RIGHTS TO BENEFITS INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 Kristin McCulloch initiated this ERISA action after she was denied benefits under an employer-sponsored long-term disability group plan (“LTD Policy”) administered by Hartford Insurance. The Court previously determined McCulloch qualified as disabled from her “own occupation” under the terms of the LTD Policy and entered partial judgment in her favor under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). Dkt. No. 45. Now before the Court is McCulloch’s claim against Hartford to clarify her “rights to future benefits under the terms of the plan.” 29 U.S.C. § 1132(A)(1)(B). The Court held a bench trial on February 22, 2022. At issue is whether McCulloch qualifies as a Class 1 or Class 2 insured under the LTD…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.