Hawkins

Hawkins v. Zoegall

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 15, 20223:21-cv-08670California753 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 DANIEL HAWKINS; D.D. Case No. 21-cv-08670-MMC

RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.,

7 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS' v. MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON SIXTH CAUSE OF

CHIP H. ZOEGALL; CENTRICFM ACTION; VACATING HEARING

SOLUTIONS, INC.

Defendants.

12 Before the Court is plaintiffs Daniel Hawkins ("Hawkins") and DD Restaurant 13 Group, Inc.'s ("DD Restaurant Group") "Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on 14 Complaint's Sixth Cause of Action for Recovery of Payments to Unlicensed Contractor," 15 filed May 4, 2022, whereby plaintiffs seek summary judgment on their Sixth Cause of 16 Action, a claim under § 7031(b) of the California Business & Professions Code. 17 Defendants Chip H. Zoegall ("Zoegall") and Centricfm Solutions, Inc. ("Centricfm 18 Solutions") have filed opposition, to which plaintiffs have replied. Having read and 19 considered the papers filed in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.