Rosas

Rosas v. City of Santa Rosa

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 15, 20224:21-cv-06179California4,448 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAVID C. ROSAS, Case No. 21-cv-06179-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO

v. DISMISS

CITY OF SANTA ROSA, et al., Re: ECF Nos. 9, 14, 34, 35 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff has filed the instant pro se action. The City of Santa Rosa,1 Santa Rosa Police Detective Gavin Holzapfel, and Santa Rosa Police Department property evidence technician Lisa Hansen (collectively, “Santa Rosa City Defendants”) have filed motions to dismiss the original complaint and the amended complaints. ECF Nos. 9, 34. Sonoma County and Sonoma County district attorneys Jill Ravitch, Jessica Washington, and Spencer Brady (collectively, “Sonoma County Defendants”) have also filed motions to dismiss the original complaint and the amended complaint. ECF No. 14, 35. For the reasons set forth above, the Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss the original complaint, ECF Nos. 9, 14; DISMISSES the original complaint with leave to amend; STRIKES the amended complaints,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.