Gomez

Gomez v. Trinitas Cellars, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 17, 20223:21-cv-09006California3,643 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANDRES GOMEZ, Case No. 3:21-cv-09006-WHO Plaintiff,

ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY

v. JUDGMENT TRINITAS CELLARS, LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 23 Defendant. 11 12 Plaintiff Andres Gomez is visually impaired and alleges that the website of a winery owned by defendant Trinitas Cellars, LLC (“Trinitas”), is inaccessible to him in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act. Trinitas moved to dismiss and submitted evidence outside of the pleadings that, it argued, showed the website was ADA-compliant and that Gomez lacked standing. I converted that motion into a motion for summary judgment, gave Gomez a chance to present his own evidence, and now GRANT summary judgment to Trinitas. The evidence not subject to genuine disputes of material fact shows that the website does not create a barrier to access that violates the disability laws. BACKGROUND Gomez is “visually…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.