Wescott

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 CARL WESCOTT, Case No. 20-cv-06456-JD

Plaintiff,

SECOND ORDER RE MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

DAVID CROWE, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 109 Defendants.

The Court dismissed the second amended complaint (SAC) of pro se plaintiff Wescott in all respects save for three claims against defendants Crowe and Lyonette: (1) breach of a settlement agreement; (2) breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing; and (3) negligent infliction of emotional distress. Dkt. No. 104. Although concerned about indications that Wescott has been declared a vexatious litigant in other courts, the Court reserved any action on that ground, and continues to do so here. Wescott was granted leave to amend in a manner consistent with the order of dismissal. The third amended complaint (TAC) did not materially improve the shortcomings in the SAC. Dkt. No. 106. Overall, the TAC is difficult to follow, to the point of being unintelligible in many respects. …