Mills

Mills v. Mitchell

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 21, 20224:16-cv-05095-HSGCalifornia7,272 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JEFFREY MILLS, Case No. 16-cv-05095-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

ARANA’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

v. JUDGMENT; ORDERING PLAINTIFF

TO SHOW CAUSE

K. MITCHELL, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 63 Defendants.

12 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”) officers K. Mitchell, E. Evans, J. Van Blarcom, B. Walls, and S. Arana, alleging First Amendment retaliation. Now pending before the Court are the following: (1) defendants Mitchell, Evans, Van Blarcom and Walls’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim (Dkt. No. 57); and (2) defendant Arana’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 63). DISCUSSION I. Procedural History Plaintiff commenced this action by filing a complaint in Marin County Superior Court on April 19, 2016. Dkt. No. 1 at 1. Plaintiff served…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.