Winns

Winns v. DeJoy

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 22, 20225:21-cv-04264California733 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 HARRIS L. WINNS, Case No. 21-cv-04264-VKD

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S v. MOTION FOR TERMINATING

SANCTIONS

LOUIS DEJOY, Re: Dkt. No. 38 Defendant.

13 Pro se plaintiff Harris Winns brought this action for alleged employment discrimination by the United States Postal Service (“USPS”). He now moves for “terminating sanctions” pursuant to Rule 11 and the Court’s “inherent power” on the ground that the defendant has “perpetrat[ed] a fraud upon the Court.” Dkt. Nos. 38, 39. Mr. Winns seeks entry of judgment in his favor on the merits of his claims. See Dkt. No. 38 at 6. Defendant opposes the motion. The matter is deemed suitable for determination without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). Upon consideration of the moving and responding papers, the Court denies Mr. Winns’s motion for sanctions. By presenting a pleading, written motion, or other papers to the Court, an attorney…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.