Rouse
Rouse v. Abernathy
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 XEZAKIA ROUSE, Case No. 21-cv-05708-JSC
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: MOTION TO COMPEL
v. ANSWER AND MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
RONALD HAYES ABERNATHY, Re: Dkt. Nos. 24, 25 Defendant.
12 Plaintiff moves to compel Defendant’s answer. (Dkt. No. 24.) The motion is DENIED as moot because Defendant answered the Second Amended Complaint on May 2, 2022. (See Dkt. No. 22.) Plaintiff moves for reconsideration of the Court’s order denying without prejudice his motion for jury trial. (Dkt. No. 25; see Dkt. Nos. 18, 20.) The motion is DENIED as moot on that issue because a jury trial has been scheduled for October 2, 2023. (See Dkt. No. 28.) Plaintiff also moves for reconsideration of the Court’s order denying without prejudice his motion for injunction to prevent further harm. (Dkt. No. 25; see Dkt. Nos. 19, 20.) Plaintiff asserts that Napa County and City of Napa officials have retaliated against him since he first complained…