Sahinturk
Facebook, Inc. v. Sahinturk
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 FACEBOOK, INC., et al., Case No. 20-cv-08153-JSC
Plaintiffs,
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
v. FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES
ENSAR SAHINTURK, Re: Dkt. Nos. 34, 37, 38 Defendant.
12 Facebook, Inc. and Instagram, LLC (“Plaintiffs”) filed suit against Ensar Sahinturk, alleging cybersquatting and trademark dilution in violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1125(c) and (d), and state law claims of breach of contract and unjust enrichment. The Court previously granted Plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment and ordered Plaintiffs to submit documentation in support of their request for attorneys’ fees and costs. (Dkt. No. 34.) Plaintiffs have since done so (Dkt. Nos. 37, 38), and the Court GRANTS the motion for attorneys’ fees and costs as set forth below. DISCUSSION A. Entitlement to Fees Under the Lanham Act, “[t]he court in exceptional cases may award reasonable attorney fees to the…