Sahinturk

Facebook, Inc. v. Sahinturk

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 17, 20223:20-cv-08153California1,208 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 FACEBOOK, INC., et al., Case No. 20-cv-08153-JSC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES

ENSAR SAHINTURK, Re: Dkt. Nos. 34, 37, 38 Defendant.

12 Facebook, Inc. and Instagram, LLC (“Plaintiffs”) filed suit against Ensar Sahinturk, alleging cybersquatting and trademark dilution in violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1125(c) and (d), and state law claims of breach of contract and unjust enrichment. The Court previously granted Plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment and ordered Plaintiffs to submit documentation in support of their request for attorneys’ fees and costs. (Dkt. No. 34.) Plaintiffs have since done so (Dkt. Nos. 37, 38), and the Court GRANTS the motion for attorneys’ fees and costs as set forth below. DISCUSSION A. Entitlement to Fees Under the Lanham Act, “[t]he court in exceptional cases may award reasonable attorney fees to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.