Doe
Doe v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JANE DOE, Case No. 19-cv-03310-JSC
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v. MOTION TO STAY
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 212, 213 Defendants.
12 Jane Doe brings a negligence claim against Uber and its wholly owned subsidiaries Rasier, LLC and Rasier CA, LLC (collectively “Uber”) arising from an assault by a former Uber driver posing as a current Uber driver. On May 11, 2022, the Court granted in part Uber’s opposed motion for a stay pending a decision from the California Court of Appeals in Jane Doe Nos. 1-3 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al., No. B310131. (Dkt. No. 209.) Three weeks later, the California Court of Appeals issued its decision. See Doe No. 1 v. Uber Techs., Inc., No. B310131, 2022 WL 1769112 (Cal. Ct. App. June 1, 2022) (“Doe No. 1”). Plaintiff now moves for a stay of proceedings or a continuance in light of Doe No. 1. (Dkt. No. 213.) After carefully considering the parties’ briefs and the…