Madsen

Smith v. Madsen

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 24, 20223:21-cv-04590California2,627 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANTHONY SMITH, Case No. 21-cv-04590-JSC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT; GRANTING

v. EXTENSION OF TIME; STAYING

AND REFERRING CASE TO PRO SE

H. MADSEN, et al., PRISONER MEDIATION PROGRAM Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 20,

INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, a California prisoner proceeding without being represented by an attorney, filed this civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. ' 1983 against three correctional officers at the Correctional Training Facility: H. Madsen, S. Maiorana, and V. Garcia. The Court ordered Defendants to file a motion for summary judgment, if any, on or before October 29, 2021. (ECF No. 7.) Only Defendant Garcia filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 20) Plaintiff filed an opposition (ECF No. 29), and Garcia filed a reply brief (ECF No. 31). For the reasons discussed below, the motion for summary judgment is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.