Thomas
Thomas v. Mead Johnson & Company, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TRISHA THOMAS, et al., Case No. 22-cv-02460-HSG Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO
STAY
v. Re: Dkt. No. 14 MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, LLC, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 ALYSSA ROESLER, et al., Case No. 22-cv-02480-HSG Plaintiffs, 14 v. Re: Dkt. No. 16 15 MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, LLC, et al., Defendants. KAMI HARTWICK, et al., Case No. 22-cv-02598-HSG Plaintiffs, v. Re: Dkt. No. 6 MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, LLC, et al., 22 Defendants. 23 24 Pending before the Court are motions to stay in these three related cases. The Court finds these matters appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matters are deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS the These related cases are three of several federal lawsuits filed against Abbott Laboratories relating to its preterm nutrition…