Walgreens

Marcellus Clark v. Walgreens

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 27, 20224:22-cv-01588California2,319 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARCELLUS CLARK, Case No. 22-cv-01588-PJH Plaintiff,

v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO REMAND AND

WALGREENS CO., et al., TERMINATING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS

Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 21, 22

13 Plaintiff’s motion to remand and defendants’ motion to dismiss came on for hearing before this court on May 26, 2022. Plaintiff appeared through his counsel, Allison Norder. Defendants appeared through their counsel, Christopher Archibald. Having read the papers filed by the parties and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby GRANTS plaintiff’s motion to remand and TERMINATES defendants’ motion to dismiss. BACKGROUND This is an employment discrimination lawsuit. Plaintiff Marcellus Clark is a 63- year-old African American man who began working for Walgreens in 1999 as an asset protection manager. Dkt. 16 ¶ 11.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.