McCray

McCray v. Banks

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 28, 20224:22-cv-03648California1,723 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMILAH-MONIQUE MCCRAY,

Case No. 22-cv-03648-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915

TAMMIE BANKS,

10 Defendant.

12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, pro se, applied to proceed in forma pauperis and the Court granted her application. See Docket No. 5. The Court now reviews the sufficiency of Plaintiff’s complaint to determine whether it satisfies 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Because the complaint does not appear to allege federal jurisdiction or plausibly state a claim, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the complaint should not be dismissed. Plaintiff may file either an amended complaint or a response to this order addressing why her complaint is sufficient, no later than July 22, 2022. II. THE COMPLAINT In a form Complaint, entitled “Complaint for a Civil Case Alleging that the Defendant Owes the Plaintiff a Sum of Money (28 U.S.C. § 1332; Diversity of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.