Woldeselassie

Johnson v. Woldeselassie

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 28, 20225:22-cv-00647California4,153 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 SCOTT JOHNSON, Case No. 22-cv-00647-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

MULUGHETA WOLDESELASSIE, et al., [Re: ECF No. 16] Defendants.

12 Before the Court is Defendants Mulugheta Woldeselassie and Tsehaye Woldeselassie’s (“Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Scott Johnson’s Complaint under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). Defendants own a mini market in San Jose, California that Plaintiff allegedly visited on two separate occasions in October and November 2021 to find that the market did not have a wheelchair-accessible paths of travel. Plaintiff, who is a C-5 quadriplegic who uses a wheelchair for mobility, has sued Defendants for failure to reasonably accommodate his disability under (1) the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq.; and (2) California’s Unruh Act, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51–53. Plaintiff seeks an injunction compelling…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.