Whitaker

Whitaker v. Uma & Tej Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 29, 20224:21-cv-06673California1,003 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 BRIAN WHITAKER, Case No. 4:21-cv-06673-YGR

Plaintiff, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL

v. Re: Dkt. No.

UMA & TEJ, INC., Defendant.

TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:

11 This District’s General Order 56 which governs claims brought pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) is well-known and established. Counsel for plaintiff has brought thousands of these cases and should be prepared to prosecute these cases in accordance therewith. This Court requires compliance with General Order 56 and its own Standing Order in Civil Cases. Having too many cases to manage is not an adequate justification for non-compliance.

ACCORDINGLY, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

I. EXTENSIONS

☐ The request to extend the General Order 56 deadline(s) is DENIED:

18 ☐ The request was not timely filed one week in advance of the deadline as required by the Court’s Standing Order in Civil Cases.

☐ The request…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.