Headen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BRIAN CHRISTOPHER HEADEN, Case No. 22-cv-01146-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING TIME TO

v. AMEND COMPLAINT

JOSEPH C. SCOTT, et al., Defendants.

12 13 The Court received Plaintiff’s Complaint in the instant civil rights action on February 24, 2022. See Docket No. 1 (“Complaint”). That same day, Magistrate Judge Illman received a similar complaint from Plaintiff. See Docket No. 1, Headen v. San Mateo County, Case No. 22-cv-1145-RMI. Plaintiff’s case against San Mateo County was subsequently dismissed after Plaintiff stated that he had not intended to file a second case. See Docket No. 14, Headen v. San Mateo County, Case No. 22-cv-1145-RMI. Plaintiff then protested the closing of his case against San Mateo County, stating that he had intended to consolidate that case with the instant action. See Docket No. 22, Headen v. San Mateo County, Case No. 22-cv-1145-RMI (summarizing Plaintiff’s communications). Judge Illman …