Sifuentes
Sifuentes v. Dropbox, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAVID ANGEL SIFUENTES, Case No. 20-cv-07908-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
COMPEL ARBITRATION
v. Re: Dkt. No. 40 DROPBOX, INC., Defendant.
12 Pending before the Court is Defendant Dropbox, Inc.’s motion to compel arbitration, briefing for which is complete. See Dkt. Nos. 40 (“Mot.”), 42 (“Opp.”), 47 (“Reply”). The Court heard oral argument on the motion on January 20, 2022. See Dkt. No. 54. For the reasons detailed below, the Court DENIES the motion. I. BACKGROUND Pro Se Plaintiff David Angel Sifuentes III filed this action against Defendant on November 9, 2020. Dkt. No. 1. He then filed an amended complaint on January 21, 2021. Dkt. No. 10 (“Am. Comp.”). Plaintiff alleges that his Dropbox account was compromised in a 2012 data breach, which put his personal information at risk. Id. at 2. Plaintiff further alleges that Dropbox failed to inform him of the breach, and that his personal information has been stolen…