MacClelland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TERESA MACCLELLAND, et al., Case No. 21-cv-08592-EMC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

v.

MOTION TO COMPEL

ARBITRATION AND STAY

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, et al., PROCEEDINGS, AND DENYING

DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR

Defendants.

LEAVE TO FILE NOTIFICATION OF

CHANGE TO CUSTOMER

AGREEMENT

Docket Nos. 20,

14 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs, individually, as private attorneys general, and on behalf of a putative class of other customers similarly situated, allege that Defendants Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless and Verizon Communications Inc. (collectively, “Verizon”), engaged in false advertising by failing to disclose an “Administrative Charge” for wireless services, and misrepresenting that the fee is a tax or government regulation. Plaintiffs assert claims under California law pursuant to the Consumer Legal Remedies Act, False Advertising Law, and Unfair Competition Law seeking …