Guzman

Guzman v. Jones

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 22, 20224:19-cv-03757-HSGCalifornia8,940 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MAYITO GUZMAN, Case No. 19-cv-03757-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDERING

PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE

D. DORSEY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 33 Defendants.

12 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”) correctional officers Dorsey and Boerum regarding events at SQSP, where he was previously housed. Now pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Dkt. No. 33. Plaintiff has not filed an opposition, despite receiving an extension of time to do so, and the deadline to file the opposition has since passed. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ summary judgment motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART and Plaintiff is ordered to show cause why his case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.