Moradpour
Moradpour v. Velodyne Lidar, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 MEYSAM MORADPOUR, et al., Case No. 21-cv-01486-SI
Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' v. REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
VELODYNE LIDAR, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 104 Defendants.
11 Before the Court is defendants’ request that the Court consider twenty six documents in evaluating the pending motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint For Violations of the Federal Securities Laws. Dkt. No. 104. District courts generally may not consider material outside the pleadings when assessing the sufficiency of a complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Lee v. City of Los Angeles, 250 F.3d 668, 688 (9th Cir. 2001). However, the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (“PSLRA”) permits courts considering a motion to dismiss governed by the PSLRA to consider “documents incorporated into the complaint by reference, and matters of which a…