UnifySCC

UnifySCC v. Cody

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 30, 20225:22-cv-01019California8,759 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 UNIFYSCC, et al., Case No. 22-cv-01019-BLF

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

SARA H. CODY, et al., [Re: ECF No. 27] Defendants.

12 In this case, Tom Davis, Maria Ramirez, and unincorporated association UnifySCC challenge Defendant Santa Clara County’s requirement that its employees be vaccinated against COVID-19, a highly contagious and deadly disease that has claimed the lives of over 1 million Americans and over 6 million people worldwide in just over two years. Plaintiffs allege that the County’s vaccine mandate (which requires that County employees be COVID-19 vaccinated or obtain an exemption from the mandate as a condition of their employment) and its accommodations for those that obtain exemptions violate the First Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment, and California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act. See ECF No. 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.