Teetex LLC v. Zeetex, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 5, 20224:20-cv-07092California4,462 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TEETEX LLC, Case No. 20-cv-07092-JSW

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, AND

v. DENYING, IN PART, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES ZEETEX, LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 74 Defendants.

12 Now before the Court for consideration is the motion for attorneys’ fees filed by Defendants Zeetex, LLC and Ziajie Zhu (collectively, “Zhu Defendants). The Court has considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, and it finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. See N.D. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS, IN PART, and DENIES, IN PART, the Zhu Defendants’ motion. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Teetex, LLC (“Teetex”) sued Defendants for trademark infringement, alleging that the Zeetex mark was confusingly similar to the Teetex mark and led to actual confusion. On April 22, 2022, the Court granted summary judgment in favor of the Zhu…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.