Javidi

I. BACKGROUND

A. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

20 The instant action arises out of a family law case in the Superior Court involving 21 Javidi, Farokhian, and their minor son. First Am. Compl. (“FAC”) ¶ 6, Dkt. 6. Javidi 22 challenges various orders issued by the Superior Court in that case. The FAC, which spans 23 45 pages, alleges the Superior Court committed numerous errors “under heavy influence 24 and misrepresentations” by Farokhian and her counsel. Id. ¶ 8. According to Javidi, the 25 Superior Court became “complicit with [Farokhian]’s Fraud, Perjuries, and Lies throughout 26 [the family law] case,” thereby depriving him of his constitutional rights. Id. ¶ 7. The 27 purported errors of the Superior Court generally concern two issues: (1) a “change in custody” for their son effectuated by the issuance of a temporary restraining order, see id. ¶ 10; and (2) the calculation of child support and disposition of marital assets, including classification of a condo as community property, see id. ¶¶ 11-33. The FAC is not entirely clear in its recitation of the claims for relief. It sets forth two claims to “void” various orders of the Superior Court,…