Woodruff

Woodruff v. De Facto Barrett Daffin Frappier Treder & Weiss, LLP

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20224:21-cv-06862California1,279 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION 6 Case No: 21-cv-06862-SBA KEVIN WOODRUFF, et al.,

ORDER ON MOTION FOR

Plaintiffs, RECONSIDERATION

v.

DE FACTO BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER TREDER & WEISS, LLP, et al., 11 Defendants.

Plaintiffs Kevin Woodruff, Tanya Stutson, and Wanag Tahatan-Bey (“Plaintiffs”), proceeding pro se, initiated this action by filing a document titled “Trial by Affidavit.” Dkt. 1. The Trial by Affidavit set forth no discernable factual background or individual claims for relief; rather, it presented “points” that, according to Plaintiffs, had to be “re- butted” or “stand as truth.” Id. at 4. Defendant Barrett Daffin Frappier Treder & Weiss, LLP, erroneously sued as “De Facto Barrett Daffin Frappier Treder & Weiss, LLP,” moved to dismiss or, in the alternative, for a more definite statement. Dkt. 22. On June 8, 2022, an Order Granting Motion to Dismiss Without Leave to Amend (“Dismissal Order”) issued, Dkt. 36, and judgment was entered, Dkt. 37. On June…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.