Eagle Eyes Traffic Industry USA Holding LLC v. E-Go Bike LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20223:21-cv-07097California1,482 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EAGLE EYES TRAFFIC INDUSTRY USA Case No. 21-cv-07097-JST (TSH)

HOLDING LLC,

8 Plaintiff, DISCOVERY ORDER 9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 30

E-GO BIKE LLC,

11 Defendant. 12 Plaintiff Eagle Eyes Traffic Industry USA Holding LLC (“Eagle Eyes”) moves the Court for an order compelling Defendant E-Go Bike LLC (“E-Go”) to provide full and complete responses, without objections, to Eagle Eyes’ requests for production of documents, set one (“RFPs”); interrogatories, set one (“rogs”); and requests for admission, set one (“RFAs”). Eagle Eyes also seeks sanctions under Rule 37 in the amount of $3,912.50. Based on the parties’ written filings, it had initially seemed that the Court must decide whether E-Go was properly served with the discovery requests and whether it failed to respond in time. At the June 30, 2022 hearing, however, E-Go’s counsel admitted he was validly served with the discovery requests and that he did not serve timely responses, so there is actually no dispute about that.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.