Farr
Farr v. Pacific Gas and Electric Co.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 CYNTHIA FARR, Case No. 21-cv-08099-JSW Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING SECOND
V. MOTION TO DISMISS ll PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC CO., Re: Dkt. No.
W Defendant.
Defendants filed a motion to dismiss pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) on
15. || December 22, 2021. (Dkt. No. 7.) On April 21, 2022, this Court granted Defendant’s motion in A 16 || its entirety and as to all causes of action, granting Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint by
17 || no later than May 27, 2022. (Dkt. No. 19.) Plaintiff has not filed or attempted to file an amended
complaint. Therefore, Defendants’ second motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 20) is GRANTED and the 19 case is dismissed with prejudice. See Yourish v. California Amplifier, 191 F.3d 983, 987-92 (9th 20 Cir. 1999) (affirming the dismissal of a plaintiffs claims, with prejudice, after plaintiff failed to 21 file amended complaint within required…