Etzel

Trujillo Cruz v. Etzel

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 6, 20224:22-cv-03742California1,414 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GUILLERMO TRUJILLO CRUZ, Case No. 22-cv-03742-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

SHOW CAUSE WHY HIS REQUEST

v. FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS SHOULD NOT BE

A. ETZEL, DENIED Defendant. Re: Dkt. No.

12 Plaintiff, an inmate at Pelican Bay State Prison, filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Dkt. No. 2. For the reasons set forth below, the Court orders Plaintiff to show cause why his request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis should not be denied pursuant to the three strikes provision set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915. DISCUSSION This action is governed by the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996 (“PLRA”) which was enacted, and became effective, on April 26, 1996. The PLRA provides that a prisoner may not bring a civil action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.