Charles
Charles v. Target Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHERYL CHARLES, Case No. 20-cv-07854-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
SANCTIONS AND GRANTING IN
v. PART AND DENYING IN PART
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
TARGET CORPORATION, SEAL Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 42,
12 Pending before the Court is a motion for sanctions filed by Plaintiff Cheryl Charles. Dkt. No. 42. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court DENIES the motion. I. MOTION FOR SANCTIONS Plaintiff alleges that she was injured after she slipped and fell while in a Target store in Colma on February 2, 2018. See Dkt. No. 1-1. Ex. A (“Compl.”). Plaintiff contends that she slipped on baby powder that had spilled in the aisle. See Dkt. No. 51 at 11. As relevant to this motion, Plaintiff contends that Defendant Target Corporation…