Charles

Charles v. Target Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 6, 20224:20-cv-07854California1,958 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHERYL CHARLES, Case No. 20-cv-07854-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

SANCTIONS AND GRANTING IN

v. PART AND DENYING IN PART

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO

TARGET CORPORATION, SEAL Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 42,

12 Pending before the Court is a motion for sanctions filed by Plaintiff Cheryl Charles. Dkt. No. 42. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court DENIES the motion. I. MOTION FOR SANCTIONS Plaintiff alleges that she was injured after she slipped and fell while in a Target store in Colma on February 2, 2018. See Dkt. No. 1-1. Ex. A (“Compl.”). Plaintiff contends that she slipped on baby powder that had spilled in the aisle. See Dkt. No. 51 at 11. As relevant to this motion, Plaintiff contends that Defendant Target Corporation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.