Gosain

Gosain v. Berquist Wood McIntosh Seto LLP

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 5, 20224:18-cv-06343California5,083 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division RAJIV GOSAIN, et al., Case No. 18-cv-06343-HSG (LB)

Plaintiffs,

DISCOVERY ORDER

v. Re: ECF No. 181 BERGQUIST WOOD MCINTOSH SETO, LLP, et. al. 15 Defendants. 16 INTRODUCTION The parties’ dispute concerns the plaintiffs’ responses to written discovery requests. The defendant, Merlin Law Group (MLG), contends that the plaintiffs’ interrogatory responses are incomplete and improper to the extent they refer to documents that are not specifically identified. The defendant also argues that the plaintiffs’ responses to the requests for production are incomplete and improper because the plaintiffs have asserted privileges that are not available (either because the plaintiffs waived the privilege or never had a valid basis to claim privilege) and because the responses are not verified.1 The court can decide the matter without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). 26 27 1 Joint Letter Br. – ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.