Drevaleva

Drevaleva v. Alameda Health System

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 7, 20223:22-cv-01585California1,997 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TATYANA EVGENIEVNA DREVALEVA, Case No. 22-cv-01585-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

v. DEFENDANT ALAMEDA HEALTH

SYSTEM’S MOTION FOR PRE-

ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM, et al., FILLING ORDER AND ORDER FOR

BOND; AND DECLARAING

Defendants. PLAINTIFF A VEXATIOUS

LITIGANT

12 Docket No. 25 13 Defendant Alameda Health System (AHS) moved to declare Plaintiff Tatyana Drevaleva a vexatious litigant, require her to obtain a pre-filing order before filing additional litigation or motions, and require her to post a $50,000 bond before proceeding with litigation in the present case. (Docket No. 25-3 (Proposed Order).) As Plaintiff’s complaint has been dismissed without leave, the Court grants the first two requests and denies the third as moot. A. Factual Background AHS hired Plaintiff as a monitor technician in 2013. (Docket No. 1 at ¶ 6.) A few months later, Drevaleva sent a letter to her manager questioning her employee…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.